Efficacy vs. Equity: What Happens When States Tinker with College Admissions in a Race-Blind Era?

Sandra Black, Kalena E. Cortes () and Jane Arnold Lincove ()
Additional contact information
Kalena E. Cortes: Texas A&M University
Jane Arnold Lincove: University of Maryland, Baltimore County

No 8733, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: College admissions officers face a rapidly changing policy environment where court decisions have limited the use of affirmative action. At the same time, there is mounting evidence that commonly used signals of college readiness, such as the SAT/ACTs, are subject to race and socioeconomic bias. Our study investigates the efficacy and equity of college admissions criteria by estimating the effect of multiple measures of college readiness on freshman college grade point average and four-year graduation. Importantly, we take advantage of a unique institutional feature of the Texas higher education system to control for selection into admissions and enrollment. We find that SAT/ACT scores, high school exit exams, and advanced coursework are predictors of student success in college. However, when we simulate changes in college enrollment and college outcomes with additional admissions criteria, we find that adding SAT/ACT or high school exit exam criteria to a rank-based admissions policy significantly decreases enrollment among minorities and other groups, with the most negative effects generated by the SAT/ACT, while inducing only minimal gains in college GPA and four-year graduation rates.

Keywords: alternative college admission; Texas Top 10% Plan; affirmative action; college admissions; college readiness; college graduation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 I23 I24 J15 J18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2014-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published - published in: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2016, 38 (2), 336-363

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp8733.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Efficacy vs. Equity: What Happens When States Tinker with College Admissions in a Race-Blind Era? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8733

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().