Specialization on a technologically atagnant aector need not be bad for growth
Gabriel Felbermayr ()
No 2004-02, Economics working papers from Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
This paper presents a simple North-South model of endogenous growth, based on learning by doing, which is consistent with the following empirical observations: (i) the price of investment goods relative to consumption goods has been falling for the last 40 years in most industrialized countries, (ii) poor countries are net importers of investment equipment and (iii) after a period of initial convergence, the sample of open economies exhibits remarkable stability of the per capita income distribution. In contrast to the research tradition started by Lucas (1988), in the proposed model, specialization on the technologically stagnant consumption sector does not entail a growth penalty.
Keywords: endogenous growth; AK model; international trade; embodied technical change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F43 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Specialization on a technologically stagnant sector need not be bad for growth (2007)
Working Paper: Specialization on a technologically stagnant sector need not be bad for growth (2007)
Working Paper: Specialization on a Technologically Stagnant Sector Need Not Be Bad for Growth (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jku:econwp:2004_02
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics working papers from Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by René Böheim ().