Estimating the underground economy by using MIMIC models: A response to T. Breusch´s critique
Roberto Dell’Anno () and
Friedrich Schneider ()
Additional contact information
Roberto Dell’Anno: Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Salerno, Italy
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Roberto Dell'Anno ()
No 2006-07, Economics working papers from Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
Breusch (2005b) critically addresses an important and challenging question: Is it reliable to use the Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes model to estimate Shadow Economy? Breusch concludes that this approach is not suitable for the purpose. Breusch’s paper highlights the different procedures and hypotheses about the estimation of the size and development of the shadow economy in three papers: Giles and Tedds (2002a), Dell’Anno and Schneider (2003) and Bajada and Schneider (2005). In this paper, we will react and provide some answers to Breusch’s criticisms with special reference to the criticisms of the Dell’Anno and Schneider (2003) paper. According with us, the MIMIC model is still one of the best approaches to this purpose.
Keywords: shadow economy; MIMIC model; structural modelling. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jku:econwp:2006_07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics working papers from Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by René Böheim ().