Context and Interpretation in Laboratory Experiments: The Case of Reciprocity
Maria Levati (),
Topi Miettinen () and
Birendra Rai ()
No 2010-090, Jena Economic Research Papers from Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
The existing literature acknowledges that a mismatch between the experimenter's and the subjects' models of an experimental task can adversely affect the interpretation of data from laboratory experiments. We discuss why the two common experimental designs (between-subjects and within-subjects) used to conduct experiments may fail to sufficiently account for this concern. An alternative design for laboratory experiments is proposed which may alleviate this concern especially in studies of social preferences. The proposed design is used to answer some questions that have attracted continued attention in the literature on social preferences in general and reciprocity in particular.
Keywords: Experimental design; Context; Trust game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C90 D63 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-ecm, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-hpe and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Context and interpretation in laboratory experiments: The case of reciprocity (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2010-090
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Jena Economic Research Papers from Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Markus Pasche ().