EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Sho Miyaji
Additional contact information
Sho Miyaji: Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo and Junior Research Fellow, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration (RIEB), Kobe University, JAPAN

No DP2024-22, Discussion Paper Series from Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University

Abstract: Many studies exploit variation in the timing of policy adoption across units as an instrument for treatment, and use instrumental variable techniques. This paper formalizes the underlying identification strategy as an instrumented difference-in-differences (DIDIV). In a simple setting with two periods and two groups, our DID-IV design mainly consists of a monotonicity assumption, and parallel trends assumptions in the treatment and the outcome. In this design, a Wald-DID estimand, which scales the DID estimand of the outcome by the DID estimand of the treatment, captures the local average treatment effect on the treated (LATET). In contrast to Fuzzy DID design considered in de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille (2018), our DID-IV design does not ex-ante require strong restrictions on the treatment adoption behavior across units, and our target parameter, the LATET, is policy-relevant if the instrument is based on the policy change of interest to the researcher. We extend the canonical DID-IV design to multiple period settings with the staggered adoption of the instrument across units, which we call a staggered DID-IV design. We propose an estimation method in staggered DID-IV design that is robust to treatment effect heterogeneity. We illustrate our findings in the setting of Oreopoulos (2006), estimating returns to schooling in the United Kingdom. In this application, the two-way fixed effects instrumental variable regression, which is the conventional approach to implement a staggered DID-IV design, yields a negative estimate, whereas our estimation method indicates the substantial gain from schooling.

Keywords: Difference-in-differences; Instrumental variable; Local average treatment effect; Returns to education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 C23 C26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 64 pages
Date: 2024-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2024-22.pdf First version, 2024 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2024-22

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Paper Series from Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501 JAPAN. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2024-22