Background Considerations to a Regulation of the U.S. Financial System--Third Time a Charm? Or Strike Three?

Jan Kregel

Economics Working Paper Archive from Levy Economics Institute

Abstract: United States financial regulation has traditionally made functional and institutional regulation roughly equivalent. However, the gradual shift away from Glass-Steagall and the introduction of the Financial Modernization Act (FMA) generated a disorderly mix of functions and products across institutions, creating regulatory gaps that contributed to the recent crisis. An analysis of this history suggests that a return to regulation by function or product would strengthen regulation. The FMA also made a choice in favor of financial holding companies over universal banks, but without recognizing that both types of structure require specific regulatory regimes. The paper reviews the specific regime that has been used by Germany in regulating its universal banks and suggests that a similar regime adapted to holding companies should be developed.

Date: 2009-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-pke and nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_557.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_557.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://levyweb.bard.edu/pubs/wp_557.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lev:wrkpap:wp_557

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Paper Archive from Levy Economics Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Elizabeth Dunn ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).