Is there a third way to EMU for the EU accession countries?
Peter Bofinger () and
Timo Wollmershäuser ()
Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics
The actual mainstream view of academics emphasizes the so-called \"two-corner solution\" with either completely fixed or independently floating exchange rates. We will argue in this paper that the requirements for fixed rates are rather too restrictive to be successful. On the other hand, the advantage of an independent float is only valid for small open economies under the assumption of exchange rate movements closely related to movements in the fundamentals. We suggest as a \"third way\", a strategy of flexible exchange rate targeting where central banks simultaneously manage interest rates and exchange rates in a way that guarantees both the achievement of domestic macroeconomic objectives and an equilibrium on the international financial markets.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Economic Systems 3 25(2001): pp. 253-274
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Is there a third way to EMU for the EU accession countries? (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lmu:muenar:20209
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics Ludwigstr. 28, 80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tamilla Benkelberg ().