Ambiguity aversion is not universal
Martin Kocher (),
Amrei Marie Lahno and
Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics
Assuming universal ambiguity aversion, an extensive theoretical literature studies how ambiguity can account for market anomalies from the perspective of expected utility-based theories. We provide a systematic experimental assessment of ambiguity attitudes in different likelihood ranges, and in the gain domain, the loss domain and with mixed outcomes. We draw on a unified framework to elicit preferences across these domains. We replicate the usual finding of ambiguity aversion for moderate likelihood gains. However, when introducing losses or lower likelihoods, we observe predominantly ambiguity neutrality or seeking, rejecting universal ambiguity aversion.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (36) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in European Economic Review 101(2018): pp. 268-283
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Ambiguity aversion is not universal (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lmu:muenar:62872
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Munich Reprints in Economics from University of Munich, Department of Economics Ludwigstr. 28, 80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tamilla Benkelberg ().