Trade Impact Assessment (Trade SIA) of an EU-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

Joseph Francois, Hanna Norberg (), Miriam Manchin and Annette Pelkmans Balaoing ()
Additional contact information
Hanna Norberg: Lund (School of Economics and Business) and IIDE
Annette Pelkmans Balaoing: Erasmus University Rotterdam

No 20090801, IIDE Discussion Papers from Institue for International and Development Economics

Abstract: We analyze the effects of potential measures to liberalize trade between the European Union and ASEAN using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of world trade. The results on the whole point to positive effects for most of ASEAN under all scenarios, and small but positive effects over the long-run for the European Union. Throughout the study, some negative results are observed for other ASEAN countries (Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar). As expected, income and trade gains increase as liberalization deepens and as more dynamic effects are taken into account. The latter is particularly important for ASEAN, whose growth is often constrained by insufficient capital resources. In terms of income effects, the EU and Singapore gain the most, 51 and 78 percent of these gains, respectively, are due to the removal of the barriers to Services trade. It is Vietnam, however, that reaps the largest rise in GDP growth, while the EU, followed by Thailand, gains the most from the removal of non-tariff barriers. For the EU, about 87 percent of the income rise between these two scenarios is due to direct and indirect effects of trade facilitation alone. The productivity effects of an EU-ASEAN FTA are also visible in the form of higher wages both for skilled and unskilled workers. This is particularly important for ASEAN as this would mean that the employment increase in key growth sectors will outstrip the reduction of employment in contracting sectors. In terms of exports, the strong export performance of ASEAN projected here is largely driven by the export growth of ASEANÕs new members, i.e., Vietnam (35%), Cambodia, Laos & Myanmar (13%). There are negative effects for third countries, however. Indeed the net gains for most of ASEAN in the long-run are mirrored by comparable losses in third countries, much of which is carried by India and Pakistan. However, one must note that even in the scenario where the potential of trade diversion is the greatest, the effects are negative but rather trivial. Under the most ambitious trade liberalization scenario between the EU and ASEAN, it is PakistanÕs exports that are largely affected, with its exports falling by 2.4 percent. For the rest of the world, exports fall by just 0.05 percent, so that trade diversion effects can indeed be considered minimal.

Keywords: CGE; EU-ASEAN Free Trade Area; GTAP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 58 pages
Date: 2009-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-cwa, nep-eec, nep-int and nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.i4ide.org/content/wpaper/dp20090801.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lnz:wpaper:20090801

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IIDE Discussion Papers from Institue for International and Development Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by iide webmaster ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).