Sustainability in the tropics: does a boom in deforestation lead to a bust in development?
Diana Weinhold (),
Eust�quio J. Reis and
Petterson Vale ()
No 82, GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
We revisit the hypothesis tested in Rodrigues et al. (2009) that the process of human development in Amazonia follows a boom-and-bust (inverted U) pattern. We showthat the 'boombust' pattern that Rodrigues et al. report is a spurious artefact of spatial correlation, driven primarily by the large, multifaceted (and unobserved) differences between municipalities in and around Amazonas and Maranh�o states. We confirm these (non-) results in the time series data; there is no �smoking gun� dynamic boom and bust associated with land clearing in any municipality data from 1980 to 2000. Furthermore, the past economic performance of municipalities categorised as�postfrontier� by Rodrigues et al. themselves are shown to have been economic underperformers since the 1970s, and if anything they have improved their relative economic standing in the years since 2000. In sum, we find no evidence in either the cross section or the time series data of any �boombust� patterns of development in the Brazilian Amazon.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/ ... tion-development.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp82
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The GRI Administration ().