Information Feedback in Relative Grading: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Shinya Kajitani (), Keiichi Morimoto () and Shiba Suzuki

No 40, Discussion Papers from Meisei University, School of Economics

Abstract: The impact of relative performance information feedback could vary according to each student's previous examination performance. Binary grade environments enable us to identify the heterogeneous impacts of this feedback. Conducting a randomized control trial employing a compulsory course in economics at a Japanese university, we show the heterogeneous impacts of relative performance information feedback attributable to the students' earlier examination scores under a binary grade environment. Our experimental results prove that previous performance information feedback improves the performance of students with only intermediate scores but worsens the performance of high-scoring students in their next examination.

Keywords: education; experiments; relative performance information feedback; relative grading (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2018-07, Revised 2019-09-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-hrm and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://keizai.meisei-u.ac.jp/upload/admin/discussion_paper/2019/10/DP_no40.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Information feedback in relative grading: Evidence from a field experiment (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mei:wpaper:40

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Meisei University, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Koji Yokota ().