Persuasion and Limited Communication
Itai Sher ()
No 2008-2, Working Papers from University of Minnesota, Department of Economics
This paper studies optimal persuasion. A speaker must decide which arguments to present and a listener which arguments to accept. Communication is limited in that the arguments available to the speaker depend on her information. Optimality is assessed from the listener's perspective assuming that the listener can commit to a persuasion rule. I show that this seemingly simple scenario--introduced by Glazer and Rubinstein (2006)--is computationally intractable (formally, NP-hard). However under the assumption known as normality, which validates the revelation principle in mechanism design environments with evidence (Green and Laffont 1986, Bull and Watson 2007), I show that the persuasion problem reduces to a classic optimization problem, leading to a simple procedure for its solution. This procedure finds not only the optimal rule, but also the credible implementation of the optimal rule, i.e., the equilibrium of the game without commitment leading to the same outcome as the optimal rule. Normality also has qualitative consequences for the optimal rule. In particular, under normality, there always exists an optimal rule which is symmetric: i.e., ex ante equivalent evidence is treated equivalently. When normality fails, all optimal rules may be asymmetric; in other words, the listener may categorize evidence in an arbitrary manner, and base his decisions on these categories in order to influence the speaker's reporting behavior.
Keywords: communication; optimal persuasion rules; credibility; commitment; evidence; maximum flow problem. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C61 D82 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2008, Revised 2008
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.google.com/a/umn.edu/viewer?a=v&pid=s ... ZWFkZTA4NjYyN2ZmNzc5 First version, 2008 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:min:wpaper:2008-2
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Minnesota, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Caty Bach ().