The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments
Massimo Motta and
No 17-01, Working Papers from University of Mannheim, Department of Economics
It has been suggested that mergers, by increasing concentration, raise incentives to invest and hence are pro-competitive. To study the effects of mergers, we rewrite a game with simultaneous price and cost-reducing investment choices as one where firms only choose prices, and make use of aggregative game theory. We find no support for that claim: absent effciency gains, the merger lowers total investments and consumer surplus.Only if it entails suffcient effciency gains, will it be pro-competitive. We also show there exist classes of models for which the results obtained with cost-reducing investments are equivalent to those with quality-enhancing investments.
JEL-codes: K22 D43 L13 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-gth, nep-law, nep-mic and nep-mkt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, When Firms compete in Prices and Investments (2018)
Working Paper: The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, when Firms Compete in Prices and Investments (2017)
Working Paper: The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mnh:wpaper:42805
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Mannheim, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Katharina Rautenberg ().