EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Accepting Zero in the Ultimatum Game Does Not Reflect Selfish Preferences

Gianandrea Staffiero, Filippos Exadaktylos () and Antonio Espín ()
Additional contact information
Gianandrea Staffiero: Universitat Pompeu Fabra

No 201203, Working Papers from Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University

Abstract: The rejection of unfair proposals in ultimatum games is often quoted as evidence of other-regarding preferences. In this paper we focus on those responders who accept any proposals, setting the minimum acceptable offer (MAO) at zero. While this behavior could result from the randomization between the two payoff-maximizing strategies (i.e. setting MAO at zero or at the smallest positive amount), it also implies that the opponent’s payoff is maximized and the “pie” remains intact. We match subjects’ behavior as ultimatum responders with their choices in the dictator game, in two large-scale experiments. We find that those who set MAO at zero are the most generous dictators. Moreover, they differ substantially from responders whose MAO is the smallest positive offer, who are the greediest dictators. Thus, an interpretation of zero MAOs in terms of selfish, payoff-maximizing behavior could be misleading. Our evidence indicates that the restraint from punishing others can be driven by altruism and by the desire to maximize social welfare.

Keywords: ultimatum game; dictator game; altruism; social welfare; costly punishment; selfishness; social preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C91 C93 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18 pages
Date: 2012-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://repeck.bilgi.org.tr/RePEc/msc/wpaper/mscenter_2012_03_Accepting_Zero.pdf First version, 2012 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Accepting zero in the ultimatum game does not reflect selfish preferences (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:msc:wpaper:201203

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cankut Kuzlukoglu ().

 
Page updated 2022-08-29
Handle: RePEc:msc:wpaper:201203