Unanimity and the Anscombe’s Paradox
Gilbert Laffond () and
Jean Lainé ()
Additional contact information
Gilbert Laffond: Laboratoire d'Econometrie, LIRSA
No 201301, Working Papers from Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University
We establish a new suffcient condition for avoiding a generalization of the Anscombe’s paradox. In a situation where ballots describe positions regarding ﬁnitely many yes-or-no issues, the Anscombe’s alpha−paradox holds if more than alpha % of the voters disagree with on a majority of issues with the outcome of issue-wise majority voting. We deﬁne the level of unanimity of a set of ballots as the number of issues minus the maximal symmetric diatance between two ballots. We compute for the caseof large electorates, the exact level of unanimity above which the Anscombe’s alpha−paradox never holds, whatever the distribution of votes among ballots.
Keywords: Anscombe; Voting Paradox; Majority Rule; Unamity Issue-wise voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D71 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://repeck.bilgi.edu.tr/RePEc/msc/wpaper/mscenter_2013_12_AncombesParadox.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Unanimity and the Anscombe’s paradox (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:msc:wpaper:201301
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Fatma Aslan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).