How Unobservable Productivity Biases the Value of a Statistical Life

Thomas Kniesner, W Viscusi, Christopher Woock () and James Ziliak

No 11659, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: A prominent theoretical controversy in the compensating differentials literature concerns unobservable individual productivity. Competing models yield opposite predictions depending on whether the unobservable productivity is safety-related skill or productivity generally. Using five panel waves and several new measures of worker fatality risks, first-difference estimates imply that omitting individual heterogeneity leads to overestimates of the value of statistical life, consistent with the latent safety-related skill interpretation. Risk measures with less measurement error raise the value of statistical life, the net effect being that estimates from the static model range from $5.3 million to $6.7 million, with dynamic model estimates somewhat higher.

JEL-codes: I10 J17 J28 K00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff, nep-hea and nep-law
Note: EH LE PE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11659.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11659

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11659

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().