The Welfare Impact of Reducing Choice in Medicare Part D: A Comparison of Two Regulation Strategies
Claudio Lucarelli,
Jeffrey Prince and
Kosali Simon
No 14296, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Motivated by widely publicized concerns that there are "too many" plans, we structurally estimate (and validate) an equilibrium model of the Medicare Part D market to study the welfare impacts of two feasible, similar-sized approaches for reducing choice. One reduces the maximum number of firm offerings regionally; the other removes plans providing donut hole coverage - consumers' most valued dimension. We find welfare losses are far smaller when coupled with elimination of a dimension of differentiation, as in the latter approach. We illustrate our findings' relevance under current health care reforms, and consider the merits of instead imposing ex ante competition for entry.
JEL-codes: H42 H51 I11 I18 L13 L51 L88 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-hea, nep-ias, nep-mic and nep-reg
Note: EH
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Published as Claudio Lucarelli & Jeffrey Prince & Kosali Simon, 2012. "The Welfare Impact Of Reducing Choice In Medicare Part D: A Comparison Of Two Regulation Strategies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 53(4), pages 1155-1177, November.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14296.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: THE WELFARE IMPACT OF REDUCING CHOICE IN MEDICARE PART D: A COMPARISON OF TWO REGULATION STRATEGIES (2012) 
Working Paper: The Welfare Impact of Reducing Choice in Medicare Part D: A Comparison of Two Regulation Strategies (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14296
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14296
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().