EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Logical Implications of GASB's Methodology for Valuing Pension Liabilities

Robert Novy-Marx

No 17613, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: It is well known that the funding status of state and local government defined benefit pension plans, as measured by the accounting methodology prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), improves when the plans take on more investment risk. This paper documents several lesser known logical implications of the GASB methodology. In particular, I show that GASB accounting is susceptible to the "Yogi Berra fallacy," under which a pizza is less filling when sliced into fewer pieces: GASB gives different "valuations" for the exact same assets and liabilities when they are partitioned differently among plans. Moreover, the marginal valuation of assets can be negative under GASB. In such cases a plan can improve its GASB funding status literally by burning money. Finally, I show that GASB's methodology is exactly equivalent to fairly valuing plan liabilities, but accounting for stocks at more than twice their traded prices, and further crediting a plan an additional dollar for each dollar of stock that it intends to buy in the future.

JEL-codes: H55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-11
Note: AP PE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published as Novy-Marx, Robert, “Logical Implications of GASB’s Methodology for Valuing Pension Liabilities,” Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 2013, 26-32.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w17613.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17613

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w17613

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (wpc@nber.org).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17613