Tall or Taller, Pretty or Prettier: Is Discrimination Absolute or Relative?

Daniel Hamermesh

No 18123, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Using several microeconomic data sets from the United States and the Netherlands, and the examples of height and beauty, this study examines whether: 1) Absolute or relative differences in a characteristic are what affect labor-market and other outcomes; and 2) The effects of a characteristic change when all agents acquire more of it--become taller or better-looking. Confronted with a choice among individuals, decision-makers respond more to absolute than to relative differences among them. Also, an increase in the mean of a characteristic's distribution does not alter market responses to differences in it.

JEL-codes: J71 J78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-lab, nep-lma and nep-ltv
Note: LS
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Published as IZA Journal of Labor Economics 2012, 1:2 doi:10.1186/2193-8997-1-2

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w18123.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Tall or taller, pretty or prettier: is discrimination absolute or relative? (2012)
Working Paper: Tall or Taller, Pretty or Prettier: Is Discrimination Absolute or Relative? (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18123

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w18123

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().