Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209
Peter Arcidiacono,
Esteban Aucejo,
Patrick Coate and
V. Joseph Hotz
No 18523, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, graduation rates increased by 4.4%. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students, explaining 18% of the graduation rate increase in our preferred specification. Further, universities appear to have responded to Prop 209 by investing more in their students, explaining between 23-64% of the graduation rate increase.
JEL-codes: I23 I28 J15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
Note: ED
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Published as Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209 Peter Arcidiacono12*, Esteban Aucejo3, Patrick Coate4 and V Joseph Hotz125 * Corresponding author: Peter Arcidiacono peter.arcidiacono@duke.edu Author Affiliations For all author emails, please log on. IZA Journal of Labor Economics 2014, 3:7 doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 Published: 15 September 2014
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w18523.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209 (2013) 
Working Paper: Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209 (2013) 
Working Paper: Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209 (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18523
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w18523
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().