Economics at your fingertips  

Elections and Divisiveness: Theory and Evidence

Elliott Ash (), Massimo Morelli () and Richard Van Weelden ()

No 21422, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: This paper analyzes the effort allocation choices of incumbent politicians when voters are uncertain about politician preferences. There is a pervasive incentive to "posture" by over-providing effort to pursue divisive policies, even if all voters would strictly prefer to have a consensus policy implemented. As such, the desire of politicians to convince voters that their preferences are aligned with the majority of the electorate can lead them to choose strictly pareto dominated effort allocations. Transparency over the politicians' effort choices can re-enforce the distortions, and for some parameters can be bad both for incentivizing politicians to focus on socially efficient tasks and for allowing voters to select congruent politicians. We take our theoretical results to the data with an empirical analysis of how Members of the U.S. Congress allocate time across issues in their floor speeches. Consistent with the theory, we find evidence of political posturing due to elections among U.S. Senators. We also demonstrate empirically that, among U.S. House Members, increased transparency can lead to more divisive speech.

JEL-codes: P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm
Note: PE POL
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed

Published as Elliott Ash & Massimo Morelli & Richard Van Weelden, 2017. "Elections and Divisiveness: Theory and Evidence," The Journal of Politics, vol 79(4), pages 1268-1285.

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Election and Divisiveness: Theory and Evidence (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

Page updated 2020-09-08
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21422