Bubble Investing: Learning from History

William Goetzmann

No 21693, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: History is important to the study of financial bubbles precisely because they are extremely rare events, but history can be misleading. The rarity of bubbles in the historical record makes the sample size for inference small. Restricting attention to crashes that followed a large increase in market level makes negative historical outcomes salient. In this paper I examine the frequency of large, sudden increases in market value in a broad panel data of world equity markets extending from the beginning of the 20th century. I find the probability of a crash conditional on a boom is only slightly higher than the unconditional probability. The chances that a market gave back it gains following a doubling in value are about 10%. In simple terms, bubbles are booms that went bad. Not all booms are bad.

JEL-codes: G01 G14 N2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
Note: AP
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Published as Goetzmann William N. Research Foundation Books 2016 2016:3, 149-168

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w21693.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21693

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w21693

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().