EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nonlinear Pricing in Village Economies

Orazio Attanasio () and Elena Pastorino ()

No 21718, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: This paper analyzes and estimates the impact of quantity discounts for basic staples in rural Mexico. We propose a model of price discrimination that nests those of Maskin and Riley (1984) and Jullien (2000), in which consumers differ in their tastes and, due to subsistence constraints, in their ability to pay for a good. We show that, under mild conditions, a model in which consumers face heterogeneous subsistence or budget constraints is equivalent to one in which consumers have access to heterogeneous outside options. We then rely on known results (Jullien (2000)) to characterize the equilibrium price schedule. We analyze the effects of nonlinear pricing on market participation, as well as the impact of a market-wide income transfer on the price schedule, when consumers are differentially budget constrained. Such a transfer, which is a common policy in developing countries, stimulates consumption by increasing households’ ability to pay but also typically leads to an increase in the intensity of price discrimination. We prove that the structural parameters of the model are identified from data on prices and quantities in a given market. The intuition behind this identification result is that the equilibrium price schedule in a market is a function of the distribution of consumers’ willingness and ability to pay, which, in turn, is related to the distribution of quantities. We estimate the parameters of the model using data from municipalities and localities in Mexico on three commodities, rice, kidney beans, and sugar, which are consumed by most households and are part of the evaluation component of the well-known conditional cash transfer program Progresa. The model fits the data remarkably well. Interestingly, we find that nonlinear pricing is beneficial to a large number of households, especially those who consume small quantities, relative to linear pricing. Available evidence indicates that the program had no effect on average prices. We show, however, that the program has affected the slope (in quantity) of the price schedule, which has become steeper as implied by our model, and has thus lead to an increase in the degree of price discrimination. We also show that, empirically, accounting for the impact of the hazard function of the distribution of quantities on prices, as consistent with our model, explains a large fraction of the shift in the price schedule induced by the program.

JEL-codes: D42 D43 D82 I38 O12 O13 O22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com and nep-mkt
Note: DEV IO LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w21718.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Nonlinear Pricing in Village Economies (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21718

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w21718

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2023-03-26
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21718