What is Different About Urbanization in Rich and Poor Countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States

Juan Chauvin, Edward Glaeser, Yueran Ma and Kristina Tobio

No 22002, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Are the well-known facts about urbanization in the United States also true for the developing world? We compare American metropolitan areas with comparable geographic units in Brazil, China and India. Both Gibrat’s Law and Zipf’s Law seem to hold as well in Brazil as in the U.S., but China and India look quite different. In Brazil and China, the implications of the spatial equilibrium hypothesis, the central organizing idea of urban economics, are not rejected. The India data, however, repeatedly rejects tests inspired by the spatial equilibrium assumption. One hypothesis is that the spatial equilibrium only emerges with economic development, as markets replace social relationships and as human capital spreads more widely. In all four countries there is strong evidence of agglomeration economies and human capital externalities. The correlation between density and earnings is stronger in both China and India than in the U.S., strongest in China. In India the gap between urban and rural wages is huge, but the correlation between city size and earnings is modest. The cross-sectional relationship between area-level skills and both earnings and area-level growth are also stronger in the developing world than in the U.S. The forces that drive urban success seem similar in the rich and poor world, even if limited migration and difficult housing markets make it harder for a spatial equilibrium to develop.

JEL-codes: O15 O18 R12 R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-geo, nep-lam, nep-ltv and nep-ure
Note: DEV LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (88)

Published as Juan Pablo Chauvin & Edward Glaeser & Yueran Ma & Kristina Tobio, 2016. "What is Different About Urbanization in Rich and Poor Countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States," Journal of Urban Economics, .

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22002.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: What is different about urbanization in rich and poor countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States (2017)
Working Paper: What is Different about Urbanization in Rich and Poor Countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22002

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().