Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions
Alma Cohen and
Crystal Yang
No 24615, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
This paper investigates whether judge political affiliation contributes to racial and gender disparities in sentencing using data on over 500,000 federal defendants linked to sentencing judge. Exploiting random case assignment, we find that Republican-appointed judges sentence black defendants to 3.0 more months than similar non-blacks and female defendants to 2.0 fewer months than similar males compared to Democratic-appointed judges, 65 percent of the baseline racial sentence gap and 17 percent of the baseline gender sentence gap, respectively. These differences cannot be explained by other judge characteristics and grow substantially larger when judges are granted more discretion.
JEL-codes: H1 J15 J71 K0 K14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gen, nep-law and nep-pol
Note: LE PE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published as Alma Cohen & Crystal S. Yang, 2019. "Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol 11(1), pages 160-191.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w24615.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24615
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w24615
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().