EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Reference Points Merely Lagged Beliefs Over Probabilities?

Ori Heffetz

No 24721, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: What explains the mixed evidence from laboratory tests of Kőszegi and Rabin’s (2006 and later) model of expectations-based reference-dependent preferences? We investigate one hypothesis: to become (behavior-affecting) reference points, probability beliefs have to sink in—being merely lagged, as the theory requires, is not sufficient. Past experiments with conflicting findings exogenously endowed subjects with beliefs that were equally lagged, but possibly unequally sunk-in. In four experiments, whose designs replicate past KR-nonsupporting experiments, we add new sink-in manipulations that endow individuals with additional, visual/physical probability impressions. Our findings are more KR-supporting in an endowment-effect setting but not in an effort-provision setting.

JEL-codes: D12 D84 D91 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-neu and nep-upt
Note: AG LE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w24721.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24721

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w24721

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2020-09-15
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24721