More (or Less) Economic Limits of the Blockchain
Joshua Gans and
Neil Gandal
No 26534, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
This paper extends the blockchain sustainability framework of Budish (2018) to consider proof of stake (in addition to proof of work) consensus mechanisms and permissioned (where the number of nodes are fixed) networks. It is demonstrated that an economically sustainable network will involve the same cost regardless of whether it is proof of work or proof of stake although in the later the cost will take the form of illiquid financial resources. In addition, it is shown that regulating the number of nodes (as in a permissioned network) does not lead to additional cost savings that cannot otherwise be achieved via a setting of block rewards in a permissionless (i.e., free entry) network. This suggests that permissioned networks will not be able to economize on costs relative to permissionless networks.
JEL-codes: D00 E50 L10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac, nep-mic and nep-net
Note: PR
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w26534.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: More (or Less) Economic Limits of the Blockchain (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26534
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w26534
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().