Reconsidering Returns

Samuel M. Hartzmark and David H. Solomon

No 27380, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Investors' perception of performance is biased because the relevant measure, returns, is rarely displayed. Major indices ignore dividends thereby underreporting market performance. Newspapers are more pessimistic on ex-dividend days, consistent with mistaking the index for returns. Market betas should track returns, but track prices more than dividends, creating predictable returns. Mutual funds receive inflows for “beating the S&P 500,” price index based on net asset value (also not a return). Investors extrapolate market indices, not returns, when forming annual performance expectations. Displaying returns by default would ameliorate these issues, which arise despite high attention and agreement on the appropriate measure.

JEL-codes: G02 G11 G12 G14 N2 N21 N22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fmk
Note: AP
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published as Samuel M Hartzmark & David H Solomon & Lauren Cohen, 2021. "Reconsidering Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, vol 35(1), pages 343-393.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w27380.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27380

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w27380

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().