EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule?

Martin Ravallion

No 27554, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The rising popularity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in development applications has come with continuing debates about the merits of this approach. The paper takes stock of the issues. It argues that an unconditional preference for RCTs is questionable on three main counts. First, the case for such a preference is unclear on a priori grounds. For example, with a given budget, even a biased observational study can come closer to the truth than a costly RCT. Second, the ethical objections to RCTs have not been properly addressed by advocates. Third, there is a risk of distorting the evidence-base for informing policymaking, given that an insistence on RCTs generates selection bias in what gets evaluated. Going forward, pressing knowledge gaps should drive the questions asked and how they are answered, not the methodological preferences of some researchers. The gold standard is the best method for the question at hand.

JEL-codes: B41 C93 O22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-exp and nep-hpe
Note: DEV
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w27554.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule? (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27554

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w27554

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27554