Self-Reported vs. Objective Measures of Health in Retirement Models

John Bound

No 2997, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Labor supply estimates are sensitive to the measures of health used. When self reported measures are used health seems to playa larger role and economic factors a smaller one than when more objective measures are used" While most authors have interpreted these results as an indication of the biases inherent in using self-reported measures, there are reasons to be suspicious of estimates based on more objective measures as well. In this paper I construct a statistical model incorporating both self-reported and objective measures of health. I use the model to show the potential biases involved in using either measure of health or in using one to instrument the other- When outside information on the validity of self-reported measures of health are incorporated into the model estimates suggest that the self-reported measures of health perform better than many have believed.

Date: 1989-06
Note: AG
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published as Journal of Human Resourcesm 26: 106-38 Winter 1991

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w2997.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:2997

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w2997

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().