The Incidence of Adverse Selection: Theory and Evidence from Health Insurance Choices
Michael Geruso,
Timothy Layton and
Adam Leive
No 31435, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Existing research on selection in insurance markets focuses on how adverse selection distorts prices and misallocates products across people. This ignores the distributional consequences of who pays the higher prices. In this paper, we show that the distributional incidence depends on the correlations between income, expected costs, and insurance demand. We discuss the general implications for the design of subsidies and mandates when policymakers value both equity and efficiency. Then, in an empirical case study of a large employer, we show that the incidence of selection falls on higher-income employees, who are more likely to choose generous health insurance plans.
JEL-codes: D31 D8 D82 H22 I13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-cta and nep-hea
Note: AG EH PE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31435.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31435
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31435
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().