A Normative Case for Positive Capital Income Taxes
Andrew Abel and
Stavros Panageas
No 32961, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
We characterize a planner’s optimal allocation of consumption and capital in the presence of privately-observed idiosyncratic shocks to capital depreciation and a proportional cost of reversing investment to transform used capital into consumption. In the competitive decentralization of the planner’s optimal balanced growth path, the optimal tax rate on capital income, which implements the planner’s optimal (partial) sharing of idiosyncratic depreciation risks, equals the reversibility cost, regardless of the distribution of shocks and the parameters of the production and utility functions. The risk reduction mechanism differs from the Domar-Musgrave mechanism because the government cannot share the unobservable idiosyncratic shocks.
JEL-codes: E6 H2 H6 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-inv, nep-ipr and nep-pbe
Note: AP EFG PE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w32961.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32961
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w32961
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().