EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

“No One Can Borrow” – Reassessing the “Junior Can’t Borrow” Equity-Premium Puzzle Resolution

Jasmina Hasanhodzic and Laurence Kotlikoff

No 34328, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: “The equity premium puzzle” refers to the difficulty, shown in Mehra and Prescott’s seminal 1985 paper, of simulating a realistic equity premium in macro models. “Junior Can’t Borrow,” Constantinides, Donaldson, and Mehra’s (CDM) influential 2002 paper, seeks to resolve this puzzle. Their answer is to fully restrict borrowing by the young. This imposed reduction in bond supply raises the price of safe bonds and lowers their yield, producing a meaningful equity premium. But CDM’s model is highly stylized, an OLG endowment economy with just three periods and a specific configuration of age-specific risks. Our paper revisits CDM’s solution within a large-scale, stochastic, OLG economy. Our model has 80 periods, 81 state variables, and, otherwise, standard RBC modeling of production, endogenous factor returns, and TFP and depreciation macro shocks. For computational convenience, we posit hypothetical steeply rising soft-borrowing costs to shut down bond supply on an age-specific basis. As we show, eliminating borrowing by all, not just young generations, i.e. “No One Can Borrow”, not “Junior Can’t Borrow”, is required to “resolve” the equity premium puzzle. This holds despite our assumption of far larger macro shocks than observed. Overstating macro shocks is required to match the variability of the return on national wealth. Despite our larger-than-life macro shocks, our model’s agents can largely self insure by adjusting their saving and relying on good times to average out bad times. Self insurance explains why generations, regardless of age, are close to indifferent between holding or supplying bonds and equity. Once we omit our borrowing cost function, chosen for illustrative purposes not realism, the equity premium puzzle reemerges full force. Hence, unlike CDM, our paper reinforces, rather than resolves, the puzzle.

JEL-codes: E0 E44 G0 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-fdg
Note: AP
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w34328.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34328

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w34328
The price is Paper copy available by mail.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2026-10-18
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34328