EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Price of Political Ties: Reputational Risk and the Strategic Divestment of Corporate PACs

Eric A. Baldwin, Takuma Iwasaki, John Donohue and Charlie Grabois

No 35494, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Political contributions generate access and influence for firms, but their public visibility exposes firms to reputational risk. We study how firms adjust their political spending when the reputational cost of political ties rises sharply. To identify this response, we exploit fatal school shootings and mass shootings as exogenous shocks to the salience of gun violence in the United States. We implement a staggered difference-in-differences design on a panel of corporate PAC contributions to U.S. House candidates, 2000–2024. We find that corporate PACs divest selectively and temporarily following gun violence shocks. Contributions to Republican candidates fall by 70.3% after fatal school shootings in competitive districts and return to baseline within nine months, with no substitution toward Democratic candidates. A parallel penalty of 60.9% emerges for Republicans in safe Democratic districts but is absent in safe Republican districts. Mass shootings generate similar perturbations in corporate contributions. These patterns indicate that firms withdraw only where the reputational risk of continued association is high or its strategic value is low. The observed divestment appears across industries and is stronger for firms with greater consumer exposure. Our findings reveal that firms treat political ties as time-varying liabilities, temporarily withdrawing visible financial support when issue salience spikes and resuming once public attention fades, leaving firms’ long-run political investment intact. Since public pressure is limited and dissipates quickly, and corporate divestment is transient rather than durably reallocated, the underlying financial incentives facing policymakers remain unchanged in the long run, sustaining the policy status quo.

JEL-codes: C23 D22 D72 G32 H32 L21 M14 P10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07
Note: LE POL
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w35494.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35494

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w35494
The price is Paper copy available by mail.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2026-08-19
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35494