Does the Human-Capital/Educational-Sorting Debate Matter for Development Policy?

Kevin Lang

No 4052, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: If education increases human capital, subsidizing education can generate economic growth and combat poverty. Estimates of its return suggest that education is a good social investment. In sorting models, the return reflects in part the information about productivity revealed by the worker's education. Thus the social and private returns diverge. It might appear that if we believe the sorting model, we should be less swayed by evidence that estimated returns to education exceed the social discount rate, and therefore less likely to support education-based development policies. This conclusion is shown to be incorrect.

Date: 1992-04
Note: LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published as American Economic Review, Vol. 84, no. 1 (1994): 353-358.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4052.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does the Human-Capital/Educational-Sorting Debate Matter for Development Policy? (1994)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4052

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4052

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().