Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous Innovation

Alwyn Young

No 4256, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The influence of Schumpeter's notion of "creative destruction" may have led to an overemphasis on substitution between technologies in recent models of endogenous innovation. Historical examples of technological change suggest that new technologies may just as frequently complement older technologies, creating, rather than destroying, rents. Acknowledgement of the potential for both substitution and complementarity amongst inventions allows for a much richer characterization of the growth process, creating the possibility of threshold effects and multiple equilibria, and bringing to the forefront the important role played by the expectations of inventive entrepreneurs.

JEL-codes: O31 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993-01
Note: EFG
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (57)

Published as The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. cviii, issue 3, August 1993, (MIT Press, Cambridge),pp. 775-807.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4256.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4256

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4256

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().