The Gold Standard, Bretton Woods and other Monetary Regimes: An Historical Appraisal

Michael Bordo

No 4310, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: This paper provides answers to two questions. The first question is which international monetary regime is best for economic performance? One based on fixed exchange rates: including the gold standard and its variants? Adjustable peg regimes such as the Bretton Woods system and the European Monetary System? Or one based on floating exchange rates? The second question is why have some monetary regimes been more successful than others? Specifically. why did the classical gold standard last close to a century (at least for Great Britain) and why did Bretton Woods only endure for twenty-five years (or less)? Why was the European Monetary System successful for only a few years? To answer the first question I examine empirical evidence on the performance of three monetary regimes: the classical gold standard; Bretton Woods; and the current float; and as a backdrop the mixed regime interwar period. 1 answer the second question by linking regime success to the presence of credible commitment mechanisms, that is to the incentive compatibility features of the regime. Successful fixed rate regimes. in addition to being based on simple transparent rules. contained features which encouraged a center country to enforce the rules and other countries to comply.

JEL-codes: E42 F33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993-04
Note: IFM DAE ME
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)

Published as Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 123-191,(March/April 1993).

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4310.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The gold standard, Bretton Woods and other monetary regimes: a historical appraisal (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4310

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w4310

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().