Deterministic vs. Stochastic Trend in U.S. GNP, Yet Again
Francis Diebold and
Abdelhak S. Senhadji
No 5481, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
A sleepy consensus has emerged that U.S. GNP data are uninformative as to whether trend is better described as deterministic or stochastic. Although the distinction is not critical in some contexts, it is important for point forecasting, because the two models imply very different long-run dynamics and hence different long-run forecasts. We argue that, even for the famously recalcitrant GNP series, unit root tests over long spans can be informative. Our results make clear that uncritical repetition of the `we don't know, and we don't care' mantra is just as scientifically irresponsible as blind adoption of the view that `all macroeconomic series are difference-stationary,' or the view that `all macroeconomic series are trend-stationary.' There is simply no substitute for serious, case- by-case analysis.
JEL-codes: C00 E3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996-03
Note: EFG
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Published as American Economic Review, 86, 1291-1298 (1996).
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5481.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Deterministic vs. Stochastic Trend in U.S. GNP, Yet Again 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5481
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5481
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().