Misconceptions and Political Outcomes
David Romer
No 6117, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
A large recent literature shows that strategic interactions among actors with conflicting objectives can produce inefficient political decisions. This paper investigates an alternative explanation of such decisions: if individuals' errors in assessing the likely effects of proposed policies are correlated, democratic decision-making can produce inefficient outcomes even in the absence of distributional conflicts or heterogeneous preferences. Choosing candidates from among the best informed members of the population does not remedy the problems created by such errors, but subsidizing information and exposing representatives to information after their election do. Concentration of power has ambiguous effects. Finally, the presence of correlated errors tends to create multiple equilibria in political institutions.
JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997-07
Note: EFG ME PE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published as Romer, David. "Misconceptions And Political Outcomes," Economic Journal, 2003, v113(484,Jan), 1-20.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w6117.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Misconceptions and Political Outcomes (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:6117
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w6117
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().