The Art of Labormetrics

Daniel Hamermesh

No 6927, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Using a wide array of examples from the literature and from original estimates, this essay examines the pitfalls that make good empirical research in labor economics as much art as science. Appropriateness and cleanliness of data are considered, as are problems of extreme observations and interactions. The validity of attempts to produce exogeneity using instrumental variables and natural experiments' is examined, as are the treatment of selectivity and unobservable individual effects. Testing empirical results to ensure that they make sense is stressed along with the importance of clear, economical and useful presentation of those results.

JEL-codes: C1 J00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
Note: LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published as Hamermesh, Daniel S. "The Craft Of Labormetrics," International Labor Relations Review, 2000, v53(3,Apr), 363-380.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w6927.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:6927

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w6927

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().