What do we know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not?

Olivier Blanchard

No 7550, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The answer to the question in the title is: A lot. In this essay, I argue that the history of macroeconomics during the 20th century can be divided in three epochs: Pre 1940. A period of exploration, where macroeconomics was not macroeconomics yet, but monetary theory on one side, business cycle theory on the other. A period during which all the right ingredients, and quite a few more, were developed. But also a period where confusion reigned, because of the lack of an integrated framework. From 1940 to 1980. A period of consolidation. A period during which an integrated framework was developed starting with the IS-LM, all the way to dynamic general equilibrium models and used to clarify the role of shocks and propagation mechanisms in fluctuations. But a construction with an Achille's heel, namely too casual a treatment of imperfections, leading to a crisis in the late 1970s. Since 1980. A new period of exploration, focused on the role of imperfections in macroeconomics, from the relevance of nominal price setting, to incompleteness of markets, to asymmetric information, to search and bargaining in decentralized markets. Exploration often feels like confusion. But behind it may be one of the most productive periods of research in macroeconomics.

JEL-codes: B1 B22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-pub
Note: EFG ME
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (110)

Published as Blanchard, Olivier. "What Do We Know About Macroeconomics That Fisher And Wicksell Did Not?," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, v115(4,Nov), 1375-1409.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w7550.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: What Do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not? (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:7550

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w7550

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().