Volatility and Growth: A not so straightforward relationship
Dimitrios Bakas (),
Georgios Chortareas and
Georgios Magkonis ()
NBS Discussion Papers in Economics from Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University
This paper is motivated by the conflicting theories and empirical evidence regarding the relationship between business cycle volatility and economic growth. The average reported effect of volatility on growth is negative, but the empirical estimates vary substantially across studies. We identify the factors that explain the heterogeneity of the estimates by conducting a meta-analysis. Our evidence suggests that researchers’ choices regarding the measure of volatility, the control set of the estimated equation, the estimation methods, and the data characteristics play a significant role in the total outcome. Finally, the literature is found to be free of publication bias.
Keywords: Economic Growth; Volatility; Business Cycles; Meta-Analysis; Bayesian Model Averaging (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 E32 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0037/3 ... ios_Bakas_2017_6.pdf First version, 2017 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Volatility and growth: a not so straightforward relationship (2019)
Working Paper: Volatility and Growth: A not so Straightforward Relationship (2018)
Working Paper: Volatility and Growth: A not so straightforward relationship (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbs:wpaper:2017/06
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBS Discussion Papers in Economics from Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by King Lim ().