Competition and Specificity in Market Design: Evidence from Geotargeted Advertising
Bo Cowgill and
No 18-09, Working Papers from NET Institute
How should market designers tradeoff liquidity and specificity? We study a natural experiment in the release of a new ad targeting feature by an ad exchange. The platform introduced new targeting into select geographic markets using a regression discontinuity. The experiment affects the specificity advertising assets in the markets (ie, the availability of targeting a city or a zip code). We find evidence that additional specificity reduces the total number of ad impressions delivered by the platform, as advertisers concentrate bidding into fewer, targeted markets. Despite this, we find an overall positive effects on revenue growth in the treated areas. This appears to be driven mainly by increases in clickthrough rates and not through increases in average prices (which actually decreased), and by entry of new advertisers.
Keywords: fixed-to-mobile substitution; incumbency advantage; broadband access (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L13 L43 L96 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2018-09, Revised 2018-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-cul and nep-ind
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:net:wpaper:1809
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from NET Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Economides ().