Assessing students’ social and emotional skills through triangulation of assessment methods

Miloš Kankaraš (), Eva Feron and Rachel Renbarger

No 208, OECD Education Working Papers from OECD Publishing

Abstract: Triangulation – a combined use of different assessment methods or sources to evaluate psychological constructs – is still a rarely used assessment approach in spite of its potential in overcoming inherent constraints of individual assessment methods. This paper uses field test data from a new OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills to examine the triangulated assessment of 19 social and emotional skills of 10- and 15-year-old students across 11 cities and countries. This study assesses students’ social and emotional skills combining three sources of information: students’ self-reports and reports by parents and teachers. We examine convergent and divergent validities of the assessment scales and the analytical value of combining information from multiple informants. Findings show that students’, parents’ and teachers’ reports on students’ skills overlap to a substantial degree. In addition, a strong ‘common rater’ effect is identified for all three informants and seems to be reduced when we use the triangulation approach. Finally, triangulation provides skill estimates with stronger relations to various life outcomes compared with individual student, parent or teacher reports.

Date: 2019-11-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/717ad7f2-en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:eduaab:208-en

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OECD Education Working Papers from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().