Do Economic Warfare and Sanctions Work? Three Centuries of Evidence

Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison ()

No _215, Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: We draw lessons from three centuries of economic warfare and sanctions. Establishing cause and effect is difficult because much else was typically changing during periods of conflict. Unintended consequences were everywhere. Impact was followed (and sometimes preceded) by adaptation so that countermeasures blunted the effectiveness of economic warfare measures and sanctions. This does not mean that the original measures were unimportant, because countermeasures were costly to the target country. Civilian lives and interests were collateral damage. Economic warfare and sanctions worked most effectively when complemented by fighting power either engaged in conventional warfare or credibly threatening war as a deterrent, and they were ineffective in its absence.

Date: 2025-02-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5e44a2bd-b7d1-4665-8586-2cda927f5ff8 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Economic Warfare and Sanctions Work? Three Centuries of Evidence (2025)
Working Paper: Do Economic Warfare and Sanctions Work? Three Centuries of Evidence (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:esohwp:_215

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).