Algorithmic bias and racial inequality: A critical review

Maximilian Kasy

No 1015, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: Most definitions of algorithmic bias and fairness encode decisionmaker interests, such as profits, rather than the interests of disadvantaged groups (e.g., racial minorities). Bias is equated to a deviation from profit maximization. Future research should instead focus on the causal effect of automated decisions on the distribution of welfare, across and within groups. The literature emphasizes the apparent contradictions between different notions of fairness and profit motives. These contradictions vanish when profits are approximately maximized. Existing work involves conceptual slippages between statistical notions of bias and misclassification errors, economic notions of profit, and normative notions of bias and fairness. Notions of bias nonetheless carry some interest within the welfare paradigm, if we understand bias and discrimination as mechanisms and potential points of intervention.

Date: 2023-06-28
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2c8b2a75-9af8-44f0-97de-7dbb8455b0ed (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Algorithmic Bias and Racial Inequality: A Critical Review (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:1015

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).