EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Health Service Gatekeepers

James Malcomson ()

No 169, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: Incentive contracts for gatekeepers who control patient access to specialist medical services provide too weak incentives to investigate cost further when expected cost of treatment is greater than benefit. Making gatekeepers residual claimants with a fixed fee from which treatment costs must be met (as with full insurers who are themselves gatekeepers) provides too strong incentives when expected cost is less than benefit. Giving patients the choice between a gatekeeper with an incentive contract and one without is unstable. With one scenario, patients always prefer the latter. With another, patients have incentives to acquire information that makes incentive contracts ineffective.

Keywords: Gatekeepers; Patient refererrals; General practitioners; Fundholding; Medical insurance; Incentive contracts. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I11 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-09-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/working_papers/paper169.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Health Service Gatekeepers (2004)
Working Paper: Health Service Gatekeepers (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:169

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ().

 
Page updated 2019-12-04
Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:169