IPO Allocations: Discriminatory or Discretionary?
William Wilhelm and
Alexander Ljungqvist ()
No 2001-FE-08, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Using a sample of both U.S. and international IPOs we find evidence of the following: IPO allocation policies favor institutional investors both in the U.S. and worldwide. Constraints on the discretion bankers exercise in the allocation of IPO shares reduce institutional allocations. Constraints on allocation discretion result in offer prices that deviate less from the indicative price range established prior to bankers` efforts to gauge demand among institutional investors. We interpret this as indicative of diminished information production. Initial returns, which reflect a significant indirect cost of going public, are directly related to this measure of information production and inversely related to the fraction of shares allocated to institutional investors.
Keywords: Initial public offerings; Bookbuilding; Underpricing; Intermediation. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8bd0b602-ce4f-4747-8c17-50dc0746b7b7 (text/html)
Related works:
Journal Article: IPO allocations: discriminatory or discretionary? (2002) 
Working Paper: IPO Allocations: Discriminatory or Discretionary? (2001) 
Working Paper: IPO Allocations: Discriminatory or Discretionary? (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:2001-fe-08
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).