Is the WTO's Article XXIV Bad?
David Vines and
Monika Mrazova ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Benjamin C. Zissimos
No 417, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This paper shows that the WTO's Article XXIV increases the likelihood of free trade, but may worsen world welfare when free trade is not reached and customs unions (CUs) form. We consider a model of many countries. Article XXIV prevents a CU from raising its common external tariff, which makes CU formation less attractive and explains why free trade is more likely. In an equilibrium where two CU's do form, one is necessarily larger than the other. We show that Article XXIV has a composition effect on CU formation, whereby CUs are (endogenously) less asymmetric in size so more goods are subject to tariff distortions as they move between CUs; thus Article XXIV may be 'bad' for world welfare.
Keywords: Coalition Formation Game; Customs Union; Protection; Trade Block; Trade Liberalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F02 F13 F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-12-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f8790ffa-476e-49d9-82ed-109272ed64ea (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Is the WTO Article XXIV Bad? (2010) 
Working Paper: Is the WTO Article XXIV bad? (2010) 
Working Paper: Is the WTO's Article XXIV Bad? (2009) 
Working Paper: Is the WTO's Article XXIV Bad? (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:417
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).