EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

In-bond Diversion

Pierre-Louis Vézina () and Lorenzo Rotunno ()

No 664, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: We show that the US in-bond system of imports may be used by firms to illegally avoid trade barriers, a practice known as in-bond diversion. Digging into official Chinese and Mexican trade statistics, we uncover traces of US quota-hopping in-bond diversion by Chinese exports of textiles and apparel. This is because the illicit scheme involves declaring Chinese exports bound for Mexico but diverting them to the US market while in transit, thus creating a gap between Chinese and Mexican reports. Using the phaseout and removal of US quotas at the end of the Multifibre Agreement as a policy experiment, as well as variation in quota bindingness across products, we show that quota-bound products were associated with larger trade gaps which shrunk following the quota removals. We also find that quotas were associated with larger shares of US imports aimed for transit warehouses, confirming the use of the in-bond system for illegal quota hopping.

Keywords: Textile and apparel; illegal trade; trade barriers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 O17 O19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-07-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/12776/paper664.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:664

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2020-11-26
Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:664